Profile: trouille

Discussions

• An update on the project status

  Posted in Important message to the team October 28, 2014 3:49 PM

• Let's get organized

  Posted in The Article October 28, 2014 3:48 PM

• Temporary pause in Quench (resume July 25th)

  Posted in Important message to the team August 6, 2014 6:43 PM

• Temporary pause in Quench (resume July 25th)

  Posted in Important message to the team June 10, 2014 3:17 AM

• Clean "021020" galaxies: 11 April catalogs, comparisons, and discussion

  Posted in Data Analysis Results May 6, 2014 1:01 AM

• Clean "021020" galaxies: 11 April catalogs, comparisons, and discussion

  Posted in Data Analysis Results May 6, 2014 1:01 AM

• Clean "021020" galaxies: 11 April catalogs, comparisons, and discussion

  Posted in Data Analysis Results May 6, 2014 12:59 AM

• "021020" catalogs: "the 1149" and "the 1196", with extra fields (BPT, ppo, ...)

  Posted in Data Analysis Results April 24, 2014 8:54 PM

• Star formation rates and specific star formation rates -- comparing the quench and control samples

  Posted in Data Analysis Results April 2, 2014 3:03 AM

• Star formation rates and specific star formation rates -- comparing the quench and control samples

  Posted in Data Analysis Results April 2, 2014 2:53 AM

• Star formation rates and specific star formation rates -- comparing the quench and control samples

  Posted in Data Analysis Results April 2, 2014 2:08 AM

• Star formation rates and specific star formation rates -- comparing the quench and control samples

  Posted in Data Analysis Results April 2, 2014 1:41 AM

• Star formation rates and specific star formation rates -- comparing the quench and control samples

  Posted in Data Analysis Results March 27, 2014 8:27 PM

• Star formation rates and specific star formation rates -- comparing the quench and control samples

  Posted in Data Analysis Results March 27, 2014 6:44 PM

• How to decide which objects' MPA-JHU derived parameters are unreliable because ...

  Posted in Questions for the Scientists! March 27, 2014 5:51 PM

Subject comments (5)

• 

  Yes, that's the right approach. The central galaxy is the one in our sample. Beautiful image.

  July 18, 2013 7:06 PM
• 

  Vrooje, you write maybe AGN cuz of how bright the central core is? What's the process for thinking if something is an AGN or not? Curious.

  July 18, 2013 5:20 PM
• 

  Yes, def interesting clumpy blue galaxy. Our sample galaxies are of course the ones in the center. & as you say, ordinary.

  July 18, 2013 5:19 PM
• 

  Neat one. Galaxy itself not an artifact. Red streak likely is, but OK to ignore since not causing serious issue with galaxy shape.

  July 18, 2013 5:17 PM
• 

  I'd say: Has Features. Edge-on. Bulge yes. 1+ off-center bright clumps. Sign of tidal debris (has a faint tidal tail). Not symmetrical.

  July 18, 2013 5:15 PM

Collections (1)

• Merging Galaxies by trouille (250 subjects)

  • 
  • 
  • 
  •